Contents
Content ranking is how LinkedIn uses models to decide which posts appear, and in what order, in a member's feed, using the member's profile information and engagement history.123 LinkedIn's Pressroom said in March 2026 that it wants the Feed to be relevant to members' interests, not a popularity contest.4 Members can choose a reverse chronological feed without personalization, and LinkedIn has described ranking changes that consider the creator's perspective as well as the viewer's.56
How the feed scores and orders posts
Content ranking works by turning what LinkedIn knows about members and content into an order for the Feed.2 LinkedIn's Help Center says it uses information and engagement data about members and content to make recommendations, and presents them in an order that may be more relevant to each member.2 In May 2020, LinkedIn Engineering explained that predicted probabilities of actions such as clicks, reactions, comments and shares, expected further engagement resulting from those actions, and expected value to the creator are combined into a weighted score used to rank candidate posts.7 Its algorithms also filter out or taper distribution of low-quality and unsafe content, which means such content is shown less widely.2 A member's feed contains professional content from their network, their own shares, likes and posts, companies they follow, and other content LinkedIn believes they may be interested in.8 Recommended items may carry labels such as Trending, Recommended for you or Popular.8
Signals that shape what a member sees
Content ranking depends on signals, meaning the pieces of information the models look at, and the first group comes from the member's own profile.3 Tim Jurka wrote in March 2026 that the models consider information a member has chosen to share, such as industry, experience, skills and geography.3 They also look at how the member engages with content over time, including what they have interacted with and content they have or have not reviewed.3 On the author's side, Tim Jurka wrote in August 2025 that the ranking system factors in the author's professional identity, such as experience, content shared on their profile and skills, but not demographic information such as age, race or gender.9 He added that LinkedIn regularly checks its AI systems for unequal treatment, including whether similarly engaging posts are ranked in the same way across its members.9
Controls that change the ranking
Content ranking can be steered or bypassed by the member, building on the signals above.5 LinkedIn's Help Center says the Feed shows Top posts by default, personalized by the member's activity and interests, while the Recent view lists posts from people the member follows in reverse chronological order without personalization.5 Saving Most recent posts as the permanent feed view means the member's interests and activity data will not be used to sort the Feed or make recommendations.5 LinkedIn's blog said in 2017 that members ultimately control their Feed, and described tools to hide posts, unfollow people and companies, and tailor the Feed so LinkedIn knows what they want to see.10 LinkedIn's Help Center adds that following new people or companies is another way to improve the Feed.8
How it has changed
- 2017
March
LinkedIn's blog said the Feed is personalized based on a member's profile and relationships.10
- 2018
October
LinkedIn's engineering team described adding the creator's perspective to feed ranking, which had previously considered primarily the viewer's perspective.6
- 2022
August
LinkedIn's blog, in its Mythbusting the Feed series, said the Feed's algorithms learn about members' interests and also recommend relevant jobs and people connections.1
- 2026
March
LinkedIn said it is reducing recycled and click-driven posts in the Feed.4
Ranking techniques in LinkedIn research and patents
From LinkedIn's research and patents, which may not describe how LinkedIn works today
LinkedIn's engineering posts and research papers, along with Microsoft patents, describe recommendation and feed-ranking techniques.12131415 A Microsoft patent dated March 2021 describes ranking feed items with individual models whose scores are combined into an expected engagement score used to rank items and decide which to display and in what order.14 For the earlier ranking stage, a Microsoft patent dated February 2020 describes converting the raw scores from different early-stage rankers to a common scale based on feed engagement such as click-through rate, before a second ranking stage picks the items.15 On balancing goals, LinkedIn's engineering team wrote in February 2022 that its recommendation products, including the homepage feed, use multi-objective optimization, meaning models that predict behaviours and a search for settings that balance goals such as engagement, diversity, novelty, freshness or fairness.13 On personalization, LinkedIn's research on LiMAML (February 2024) describes personalizing recommendation models for each member by training part of the network to adapt from a few interactions and passing the result to the main model as a compact summary called a meta embedding.12
See also
References
- 1Mythbusting the Feed: How the Algorithm Works
- 2LinkedIn relevance - Optimizing the member experience
- 4How LinkedIn Is Improving the Feed to Show More Relevant, Authentic Professional Content
- 5Sort your feed by Top or Recent posts
- 8Visibility and impact of your social activity on the LinkedIn feed
- 10Simple Tips to Improve your LinkedIn Feed
LinkedIn's leaders
LinkedIn research and patents
- 6Spreading the Love in the LinkedIn Feed with Creator-Side Optimization
- 7Understanding dwell time to improve LinkedIn feed ranking
- 11Engineering the next generation of LinkedIn’s Feed
- 12LiMAML: Personalization of Deep Recommender Models via Meta Learning
- 13Using Bayesian optimization for balancing metrics in recommendation systems
- 14Personalized per-member model in feed
- 15First pass ranker calibration for news feed ranking